How to Write Review of Literature in IGNOU Project > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

For a lot of students studying at IGNOU review, reviewing books is the most confusing aspect of their project. This is especially true in the case of an ignou mcom project, where academic depth is expected but guidance often can be difficult to find. Students often ask if they should summarize their books, refret journal articles or simply gather quotes. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that a distinction could alter the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not intended to demonstrate the amount of material you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you have grasped the existing work related to the topic of your choice and how you proposal fits within it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter as it shows your ability to connect ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it is crucial to comprehend why this particular chapter is required in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three principal purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the topic you chose has been researched before and has a scientific significance. Second, it helps you determine the gaps or shortcomings in earlier studies. The third is that it creates the basis for your research goals and the methodology.

Students often view this chapter as a formality, and take content from other projects or online sources. This approach usually results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU demands original writing even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. On the other hand simple explanations are as well discouraged. When a ignou mcom project is being developed, the review of literature will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You are expected to review research papers, books journals, reports, or even publications from the government that relate in your research topic. The main focus should be on those studies closely related to your area of study.

In the case of example, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks Your literature review should examine earlier research in relation to financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is to select too many irrelevant sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom anywhere between fifteen and twenty good sources can be found If they're chosen with care.

A good source is academic journals popular books written by well-known names, RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and even university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies that are from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if the studies are fundamental in terms of.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve quality of reading and impression. Instead of composing brief summaries on the fly, separate an overview of literature into logical sections.

The chapter could be structured by themes, time period techniques, methodologies, or variables that are studied. For instance, one chapter may discuss studies related to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, while another regarding operational efficiency.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding the difference between copying content, you are actually analysing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be straightforward but academic. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary vocabulary. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Every research you share should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the objectives, the methodology used, and the major findings. However, you shouldn't list them mechanically. Do your best to link one study with another.

If you're discussing some research, you might discuss how a different author's findings supported and/or refuted the findings. This kind of approach can add the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review as a textbook chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected to studies that have been done previously.

Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in yourself. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying shows dependence.

Students often fail to connect study findings to their own subject. Each study you discuss should have a clear connection your goals for the project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant results of the review of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or where more research is needed.

After examining a variety of studies, it's possible that research was focused on large companies, while small firms were unaddressed. In the past, studies utilized secondary data, but primary data were not sufficient.

This is a reason for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your plan could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Each study mentioned must be listed in the list of references at the end of the project. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. Citation in text is more effective and looks cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the review of literature must be. There's no rule of thumb to follow, but for an MCOM project, the chapter generally ranges from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length should depend on the complexity of the topic. A broader topic requires more study, while a focused topic needs fewer but more in-depth discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A looked into bank performance and came across positive results

Write like this
Author A conducted a study about bank performance using financial ratios. It found that profitability improved by a better management of assets. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the role played by operational efficiency in increasing returns to banks.

This approach emphasizes the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get rejected or delayed due to review of literature that has been copied. Even if you reference previously published studies, the style should be unique to your project.

Check for plagiarism using tools if you can and then rewrite the content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Prior to submitting your ignou mcom task, revisit the review of literature carefully. Review each article to determine if it is relevant, whether it flows in a logical manner, and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain the reasons why my study is required. If the answer is yes, that literature study is in the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for a IGNOU Project MCOM (mouse click the up coming website) mcom project is not easy at first in particular for students who are returning into academics after a time off. If you can realize that it's more about connecting and analysis that memorization, the work is easy to handle.

Do your best to read, consider, and write in your own voice. This dedication is clearly reflected in your final work and can make the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. good one.